Perhaps. But I am taking an issue with your "Итоги правления Путина" claim that you back up with the graph above. The graph above does not control for 3rd variables, thus you cannot claim that decrease in murder rate (or the rest of goodness) is due to Putin and not, lets say, increase in disposable income. Furthermore, one can argue that the 90s killed off all who are likely to commit suicide, or drink themselves to death with methanol or get killed by others.
Now, if you want an enlightening picture, dont look at improperly conducted time series, take a look at comparables. Look at life expectancy. I wonder if Western Sahara is still beating out Russia....
Why on earth is this graph an "improperly conducted time series"??? "Итоги правления Путина" can be a running title for any postiing on current affairs, I suppose...
> Furthermore, one can argue that the 90s killed off all who are likely to > commit suicide, or drink themselves to death with methanol or get killed > by others.
And 90s created all transport-related injuries that were to be created? :)
Might it be that your dictionary gives a misleading translation of the word “итоги”? In Russian, it does not have the meaning of “effect” or “result” and, taken per se, does not deal with causation. Rather, the meaning is something like “sum” or “bottom line”; the word originates from bookkeeping jargon, “и того” = “and of those [items there are altogether]”.
That is not about politics either, as you understand.
Данные по транспортным данным так же не соответствуют действительности.
популизм чистой воды, который даже не имеет под собой ничего общего с общей картиной жизни.
Есть один график, называется он численность населения россии, при Путине оно продолжает вымирать, стареть, глупеть. Т.е. превращаемся в дряхлую, вымирающую нацию.
сами итоги (по состоянию на рубеж 2008 года) на этих графиках выглядят весьма оптимистично - кроме динамики самоубийств, пожалуй, но в ней труднее всего обвинить именно Путина
no subject
Date: 2007-12-26 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-26 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-26 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-26 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-26 11:46 pm (UTC)but correlation still means something - otherwise there would be no science at all.
check http://neznaika-nalune.livejournal.com/344020.html to see what's it about.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 12:02 am (UTC)Now, if you want an enlightening picture, dont look at improperly conducted time series, take a look at comparables. Look at life expectancy. I wonder if Western Sahara is still beating out Russia....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy
But, i dont intent for this to turn into a political debate, just statistical methods....
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 12:22 am (UTC)"Итоги правления Путина" can be a running title for any postiing on current affairs, I suppose...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 12:24 am (UTC)And 90s created all transport-related injuries that were to be created? :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:25 am (UTC)That is not about politics either, as you understand.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 08:30 am (UTC)популизм чистой воды, который даже не имеет под собой ничего общего с общей картиной жизни.
Есть один график, называется он численность населения россии, при Путине оно продолжает вымирать, стареть, глупеть. Т.е. превращаемся в дряхлую, вымирающую нацию.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-27 08:19 am (UTC)Итоги отсидки Ходорковского
Date: 2007-12-27 05:39 pm (UTC)Re: Итоги отсидки Ходорковского
Date: 2007-12-28 09:28 am (UTC)Re: Итоги отсидки Ходорковского
Date: 2007-12-28 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-29 08:01 pm (UTC)Показывает усиление контроля государства над статистикой!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-29 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-30 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-30 08:39 am (UTC)